Victims of targeted crimes have the law of self-defense in their favor. For the record, a VICTIM is defined as any person who suffers direct or is threatened physical, financial, or emotional harm as a result of the commission of these crime. Legally, Self-defense deals with protecting one’s self from attack and having a legal right in being justified to act when defending one self or others with actions even if it results in violence or deadly force. We have a right to protect ourselves and our property. Anytime your rights are being violated by these perp's in form of physical abuse (electronic weapons) resulting from these attacks, you have the right to fight back legally, criminally, and physically to defend yourself, your property, and your family from these attacks/attackers no matter their ages, strength, or intellect under the grounds of the fear and continual dangers associated with these crimes that leads to death without reason. These attackers are to be viewed as criminals participating in murders like an assignator or hired hitman. Furthermore, an attack on a person living inside a home with one or more persons’ can be considered an assault on the whole family and anyone inside the home even if it’s an indirect assault but it is still an assault on the welfare of all the people involved. Anytime the basic need are being deprived such as depriving victims of the right to work, eat, shelter themselves and their family is an direct assult. The abode is a clearly defined territory with societial and legal boundaries already established, therefore there is know excusable reason the attackers can use to explain these attacks. Actually, these attackers are really using the moral fiber of their victims to keep victimizing us. There is NO Exceptions to the rules under an Univeral Declaration of Human Rights which covers all types of violence stemming from defense of person or property. These rights state “No one shall be subjected to arbitrary interference with his privacy, family, home or correspondence, nor to attacks upon his honour and reputation. Everyone has the right to the protection of the law against such interference or attacks”. Further, it follows that, criminalize aggression resulting in loss or injury which can be proven qualitatively to have caused violence with by either loss or injury is justifiable “Self-Defense”. So even if these attackers try to claim it was just a minor initial attack at first that just exculpated into excessively gang violence is no excuse and is still punishable in our legal criminal system to the full degree due to their full knowledge of the extreme abuse of right, power, technology. Now these attackers are the only ones exhibiting an aggressive nature and impulses while showing a determination of energetic pursuit to no ends to prevent those they target from being determined to live. The targeted victims are the one’s who have the legal rights of self-defense because of the extreme measures being used against them and the physical and verbal threats and actions actually being committed. It is legal to use force to repel attacks to the degree necessary to stop, prevent, or eliminate these attacks. Many victim's of such horrific crimes have the right to use deadly force to fend off these attacker who are themselves using deadly force to cause serious bodily harm, especially when the victim has attempted to retreat, escape, move to another place of residence, acquired new employment, and to avoid assaults as much as humanly possible. In any case, targeted victims are the one’s who have retreated and de-escalated the situation even in their own castles which is viewed universally by everyone as the place where a person have safety and refuge eventhough victims legally are not required to flee their place of residence, employment, or automobile to prevent these attacks. Now what all this means is that the person not initiating the aggression or encounter are able to claim self defense. For example in the case where a fight breaks out, the aggressor may use nondeadly force if the victim resumes firghting after the original fight ends. The same circumstances applies to these confrontational attackers whether they work for the Government Agency or a Corporation due to the degree of aggression involved in these crimes. In most jurisdictions deadly force is justified when a victim reasonably believes or know's that their attackers are causing them great harm on their person especially with the attackers using these weapons. The victim is justified in their notion that they intends to kill or seriously injure the victim - thus deadly force is justifiable to prevent it. Many schools of self-defense teach strategies aimed at avoiding or defusing physical confrontations and to test their victims first. This testing process is also employed by attackers to note the victim’s response to the discomfort and fear associated with the crime(s). During this period, the attacker is noting if the victim behavior will escalate to violent assaults or what type of assertive measures the victim will take to protect themselves. Thus, through this testing, these attackers are fully aware of the legal ramifications, injuries they are committing, retilation or revenge they will face, and the impact it’s having on their victim of choice when using multiple acts and attackers. The victim is allowed to use additional methods to ensure personal safety by carrying a concealed handgun as long as they qualify to have a permit especially in matters where threats and physical assualts results in imminent danger. Victims can recover damages for the intentional infliction of severe mental or emotional suffering caused by threats or unlawful communications once they find a way to get to this level of civil actions for damages or around the opposition they must face from their attackers. In most cases, norms will win when using the rule of thumb on how any rational person would act given these situations - and the correct and stable expectations are known as a Nash equilibrium. According to resolution 3452, the declaration protects from torture and other cruel inhuman - degrading treatment and punishment. So this means our perp's can not try to use this as an excuse for the physical severe pain and abuse they have aggravated and intentionally inflicted to cause suffering even if they are just suspected of having committed these acts. No State may permit or tolerate torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. Exceptional circumstances such as a state of war or a threat of war, internal political instability or any other public emergency may not be invoked as a justification of torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. This means that these torturous acts inflicted upon victims are criminal offences under the law and criminal proceedings shall be instituted against the alleged offenders and these grounds also apply to those participating perp's who have helped. After addressing these issues with the appropriate authorities, disciplinary measures should be taken to also include an investigantion, redress, and compensation. For the record, the term Human Test Subject is defined as a living individual that an investigation is being research to obtain data by intervening or interacting with the individual(s) private information. On January 22, 1997, in the Senate of the United States, The Human Research Subject Protection Act was to provide protections to individuals who are the human subject of research, the perp’s should have obtained and documented the victims informed consent to participate as a human subject. This same consent should also been received as permission from the effected children(s) parents or guardians as well. The first principle of the Nuremberg code states that with respect to human research, the voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. The Nuremberg code further asserts that such consent must be competent, informed and comprehending. Although, the United States Code, 1520, Title 50 states within War and National Defense, under Chapter 32 which reads for Chemical and Biological Warfare Programs, allowances are made for testing without the consent of the test subject only with exceptions carried out for the following purposes: (1) Any peaceful purpose that is related to a medical, therapeutic, pharmaceutical, agricultural, industrial, or research activity. ( Now this more then likely mean, they gave always our rights to any company to use us for test subjects) (2) Any purpose that is directly related to protection against toxic chemicals or biological weapons and agents. (Their not killing us for this one) (3) Any law enforcement purpose, including any purpose related to riot control. (Most victims are too mild manner, and have not went out to kill the perp’s they know are causing the physical and mental torture, so this is not the reason either) (4) Along with The Secretary of Defense being granted the right to conduct a test or experiment only if informed consent of the testing was obtained from each human subject in advance of the testing on that subject. (We know this is not the case) (5) This type of testing is granted only if the perp’s gave prior notice to Congress no later than 30 days after the date of final approval within the Department of Defense of plans for any experiment or study to be conducted by the Department of Defense (whether directly or under contract) involving the use of human subjects for the testing of a chemical agent or a biological agent. However, the Secretary of Defense should have submitted to the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate and the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives a report setting forth a full accounting of those plans. This report should have included the experiment or study to be done, especially when death, disease, or other biological malfunction is impacting humans. (Where are these reports, and how do victims get a copy? I bet they don’t exist, especially not for the type of attacks we are under. Now who received this type of support under a grants, loans, contracts, or other awards from a department, agency, or instrumentality of the United States for the purpose of carrying out such research using human subjects? And Who are they supplying and/or selling this type of personal information to?) What are victims being compensated for and what type of legal or criminal charges are perp's looking at although they have tried to avoid prosecution at every turn? These perpetrators have violated the dignity of men, women, and children all around the world when they used violence that at times has resulted in death, sexual abuse, electronic and physical rape, torture, dangerous and degrading working conditions, poor nutrition and health, chemical and biological abuse, and psychological trauma. ACCESSORY Perp’s who help in the commission of a crime, such as providing the weapons of technology, participating in gang stalking, letting perp’s inside the workplace to further illegally torture the victim even more are assisting in the planning. To be charged with being an accessory of these crimes, it is not required for the perp to be immediately present during the crime, it only requires that the perp be aware that the crime is going to be committed or is being committed and can be charged, punished, and held to the same responsibility as the main perpetrator. AID & ABET Helping to commit a crime or assisting perpetrators while they commit the crimes does not matter, it is still a form of intent. What exactly will the perp’s of these crimes really say? Will they try to say, “we were hired just to watch”. I guess an innocent citizen can just be tortured and abused inside their home for the sake of domestic terrorism while the perp’s hide behind people, corporations, and agencies who aid and abet them in the acts of torture. ASSAULT - These perp’s knew and wanted the physical damages to take place to my body, and the mental damages to take place to my head thus also showing this by their statements of “a mind is a terrible thing to waste, and even their statement of putting my other eye out falls under Michigan Law (MCL750.81) as a Aggravated Assault intending to injure and is viewed as no accident when I was placed in a reasonable apprehension of receiving an immediate battery. My injuries serve a circumstantial proof of these higher level assaults with intent to do great bodily harm. The charge of Assault with Intent to Do Great Bodily Harm penalty alone is a Felony -- 10 years &/or $5,000. It’s know doubt that these perp’s used unreasonable physical force. Assault with Intent to Maim or disfigure by cutting, mutilating, or dismembering victim(s) also applies with penalties of Felony -- 10 years &/or $5,000. Assault with Intent to Rob While Armed also applies due to the perp’s using their advance equipment to extract (steal and Receive and Concealing Stolen Property) personal and private information 24/7 obtained from another’s brain without regard to the pain and suffering on the intended victim(s) while they were taking this property by force and has penalties of Life or any number of years. Normally, it’s required that the prosecution prove that these perp’s assaulted the victim(s) with the specific intent to kill, but for these atrocious cases when the same assault(s) was repeated again, and again, and again, it just may be waved. BURGLARY Burglary is typically defined as the unlawful entry into almost any structure (not just a home or business) with the intent to commit any crime inside (not just theft/larceny). No physical breaking and entering is required; the offender may simply trespass through an open door. Unlike robbery, which involves use of force or fear to obtain another person's property, there is usually no victim present during a burglary. BLACKMAIL - Now were these vicious personal attacks for purely commercial gain and not a matter of national security, especially when some perp’s have even tried to bribe and blackmail the victims into not reporting or talking about the crimes being committed? In my case, my perp’s even tried to utilize the information in my head to threaten and blackmail me with. It never even mattered to them if it was true or false, all they knew is that they was going to trade filthy dirty little secrets with me so I would not expose their crimes. They did not care that blackmail is a punishable crime of imprisonment and/or a fine. COMPUTER CRIME Computer crime laws in many states prohibit a person from performing certain acts without authorization, including 1) accessing a computer, system, or network; 2) modifying, damaging, using, disclosing, copying, or taking programs or data; 3) introducing a virus or other contaminant into a computer system; 4) using a computer in a scheme to defraud; 5) interfering with someone else’s computer access or use; 6) using encryption in aid of a crime; 7) falsifying e-mail source information; and 8) stealing an information service from a provider. CONSPIRACY - When ever there is an agreement between two or more persons to commit or engage in an unlawful act by unlawful means, such as an overt act (secret plan to achieve an evil or illegal end) constitute conspiracy. The victims of these crimes are not required to know the existence or identity of all the conspirators in order for this charge to apply. Even if it’s a chain conspiracy where the parties involve act separately, It is still a crime and forms the grounds for a lawsuit. For example, when employers agreed to allow the disruption of stalking, bullying, and harassment to take place within their company, they are also guilty of this crime; especially when the perp’s utilize energy weapons within the workplace to attack the victim(s); and it is not necessary for guilt that the act be fully consummated. “A statement of a conspirator in furtherance of the conspiracy is admissible against all conspirators, even if the statement includes damaging references to another conspirator, and often even if it violates the rules against hearsay evidence. The conspiracy can be proved by circumstantial evidence”. It is a federal crime to conspire to commit any activity prohibited by federal statute, whether or not Congress imposed criminal sanctions on the activity itself, and the victims injured by a conspiracy may sue the conspirators to recover damages. Mostly, in crimes of this nature, the conspiracy existed before a crime is actually attempted, whereas no attempt charge will succeed unless the requisite attempt is made. The law seeks to punish conspiracy as a substantive crime separate from the intended crime because when two or more persons agree to commit a crime, the potential for criminal activity increases, and as a result, the danger to the public increases. Therefore, the very act of an agreement with criminal intent (along with an overt act, where required) is considered sufficiently dangerous to warrant charging conspiracy as an offense separate from the intended crime. Furthermore, in my case, for example, if two or more employees within the corporation of the construction company and/or the phone company conspired to break the law and subsequently commit an act in furtherance of the conspiracy, the corporation itself was not even liable of this crime until they started following me from job to job. As a result, my perp’s have even tried to convince me that the person in the company guilty of committing these crimes against me and my family have died legally, this does not matter as long as there are surviving co-conspirators, charges are still applicable; and for that matter, a corporation is considered a person for conspiracy purposes, so a corporation can be guilty of conspiracy with it involved the union and insurance company, etc.. masterminding in criminal intent and even to conceal evidence of the crime. Legally, if a number of conspirators agree to knowingly carry out different functions in furtherance of the conspiracy, the agreement constitutes a single conspiracy even if the perp’s performed different functions. However, in some states, it may constitute multiple conspiracies. Punishment for these crimes of conspiracy is depends upon the conspiracy's objective. For example, a conspiracy may be alleged in a civil case if the plaintiff has suffered an injury as a result of the conspiracy may be used in determining the amount of damages in a civil action and the respective liabilities of civil codefendants for the payment of damages which is also punishable with a fine reaching to $10,000 and/or five years' imprisonment, or both. INTIMIDATION - Making timid, fearful, frightening or deterring the victim by threats of verbally speaking or acting in a dominating manner. This intimidation to victims has also manifested into physical threats and assaults, emotional manipulation, and public embarrassment. HATE CRIME Hate crime is the violence of intolerance and bigotry, intended to hurt and intimidate someone because of their race, ethnicity, national origin, religious, sexual orientation, or disability. The purveyors of hate use explosives, arson, weapons, vandalism, physical violence, and verbal threats of violence to instill fear in their victims, leaving them vulnerable to more attacks and feeling alienated, helpless, suspicious and fearful. MISPRISION OF A FELONY : Concealing another person's felony is (serious crime), especially when it’s concealed from law enforcement. It does not matter if the person silently just observed the crime, it is still a misprision even if you just dissuade the victim from giving evidence or withholding information that can apprehend the offender, is a misprision. This crime applies even if the perp was just trying to prevent the victim from gaining or giving evidence about this torture. Whoever, have knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the U.S., conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some judge or other person in civil or military authority under the U.S. 18 USC. Now my perp’s don’t even have this to fall back on. SURVEILLANCE ABUSE - When ever surveillance is used to monitor an individual or group of people in the manner discussed in this website to inflict victims, it violates the norm and purpose of surveillance methods used with technology. So as a rule, this type of surveillance would be ruled as a form of Mass Surveillance and constitutes surveillance abuse that was not appropriately regulated. The mere fact that a whole family and associates have been impacted by this surveillance is a crime. As victims, we did not just sleepwalk into their equipment; we were sought out either inside our homes or within the workplace to accomplish this type of surveillance - Now why else would the really follow us from job to job. To conduct covert surveillance and use perp’s (neighbors, co-workers, etc) as informants to surveil unsuspecting domestic citizens is a form of surveillance abuse. It does not matter if this surveillance abuse was being conducted by the corporation’s private security firm or with it’s employees participation. The victims of these crimes were not competitors being monitored, nor was any trade secrets going on in the form of industrial or corporate espionage. The victims are just plain everyday average working class citizens, and during the abuse of surveillance, it doesn’t matter if friends come to visit or if we go to visit them; others are being subjected to the same type of surveillance/spying - even the little children. Now how does this make you feel knowing that your privacy can be invaded within the comfort of your own four walls (sex included), let alone the comfort of your own thought field inside your head? THEFT - This is a theft act (1968) that applies to committing these offences especially to gain from the victims suffering. The Act uses the word "menaces" (which perp’s are) and it involves a warning of any consequences known to be considered unpleasant by the intended victim. This covers the spectrum from actual or threatened violence to the victim(s) to damage or the disclosure of personal information that can harm the victim. What it means by disclosure is that if the personal information is not a matter of public knowledge even ifs just a threat to revel adultery or something bad. For example even reveling a victim’s sexuality publicly is a crime. These threats inflicted upon victims of these crimes covers denial and disruption of the victim’s life. The mental and physical health, the ability to earn a living, and forcing the victim(s) to change residences. Even the denial of service in some cases. Anytime, these areas are disrupted due to elements such as (poison, gas, chemicals, sensors, lasers, and energy weapons) it’s a crime. Although these crimes and actions used are true, it is still a crime for the perp to even lie about it. More than likely, the perp’s have already admitted to their crimes thru the from of V2K or V2S. Furthermore, these perp’s had the ability to back up their threats and demands with bodily injury when they forced victims into the emergency room where the perp’s try to classify a normal healthy victim as having a mental problem. The victims had know way to avail the situation due to the energy assaults inflicted. So to cover up any future legal liability damages being filed against the participating perp’s and the organizations they represent, perp’s try to provoke the victim to commit the same type of criminal nature of assault or more serious violence so that they will not owe the legal debts to the victim. The maximum sentence under the terms of the Act is life imprisonment; this reflects the gravity of the offence, which can destroy a person's reputation, personal life and livelihood. UNLAWFUL INTERCEPTION - Although federal law within 38 states permits recording telephone conversations to which they are a party without informing the other parties that they are doing so, some 12 states (California, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, Pennsylvania and Washington) require the consent of all parties to the conversation. Within some of these states, this law also applies to in-person conversations. In the case of these crimes, it is illegal under all jurisdictions to record calls in which one is not a party, let alone, private conversations within the individual head which includes events of the victim childhood and past memories. No victim Consented to this. The penalties associated with this federal crime: for unlawfully intercepting telephone conversations, including up to five years' imprisonment or a maximum of $10,000 in fines; which also allow for civil remedies in which we victims are truly entitled in order to recover actual and punitive damages, along with the fees and costs. Furthermore, their illegal audio and video tape recordings can be requested to be utilized as Evidentiary Support. Lastly, something that also must be considered when dealing with perp’s of low morale fiber and that is, do you really think they stopped to comply or err on the side of caution to consider jurisdiction laws? VOYEURISM - this can be used to define legal and criminal charges of having perp's who have received enjoyment from witnessing the victim's and their family members suffer due to the misfortune they have created, along with the observation methods they utilize when watching victims take baths, have sex, using the restroom - and I dont have to mention the victim children are being watched as well. A voyeur does not directly interact with the victim in a normal relationship, and the victim maybe unaware that they are being observed while voyeur's derive sexual pleasure from looking especially when technology is used to record and accomplish these crimes. The perp's can be either male or female, and it does not matter if these perp's showed the information to others or not - even though they are guilty of this too. The courts will rule imprisonment for this charge and reflect the sentence to reflect the abuse and traumatic effect the victim has suffered. When voyeurism is used during surveillance. WIRE FRAUD Wire fraud crimes refer broadly to any fraudulent or deceitful scheme to secure money or property, committed or aided through the use of interstate "wires" -- meaning television, radio, telephone, or computer modem. Almost all instances of wire fraud are considered federal crimes, due to their potential interstate effects.
- Premise for Website Brief
- My Video Story Part 1
- My Written Story 2001 to 2003
- Pics of Medical Proof
- PR News
- Victims
- What Are Perp's
- "Strength In Numbers"
- Health & Medical
- Legal Laws & Criminal Charges
- Technology
- Information in the News
- Chemistry Gallery of Pictures
- Look at the Picture Gallery
- Footage For Victims
- Footage of Medical Injury
- Footage of My Energy Assualts
- Footage of My Attacks #2
- Closing Argument